The Nokia 5.4 is Nokia/HMD's mid-range entry that pairs a 6.39-inch 1560×720 LCD with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 and a 48 MP main camera, shipping with stock Android 10. It targets buyers who prioritize a clean Android experience and solid physical build over bleeding-edge specs; the phone is offered with 4 GB or 6 GB of RAM and 64 GB or 128 GB of storage. Review coverage at the time of launch framed the 5.4 as a successor to the Nokia 5.3 but noted several trade-offs compared with competitors.
This review synthesizes published benchmark aggregates and user-submitted medians from UL Benchmarks (including 3DMark Wild Life scores), and hands-on editorial testing and impressions reported by PCMag, TechAdvisor and Nokiapoweruser. Where outlets disagreed we call out the divergence (for example, battery life and camera impressions) and use median benchmark data where available.
High level: the Nokia 5.4 delivers dependable everyday performance for basic apps and social use, a sturdy polycarbonate chassis with a nano-textured back, and a capable 48 MP main camera according to some reviewers. Its weaknesses are clear: the 1560×720 HD LCD shows its limits compared with higher-resolution rivals, there is no 5G modem, and published commentary on battery life and overall camera consistency is mixed — making the device a niche pick for buyers who value stock Android and build quality over top-tier specs.
How fast is the Nokia 5.4 in everyday use?
The Nokia 5.4 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 and ships with 4 GB or 6 GB of RAM. UL Benchmarks show a 3DMark Wild Life median score of 374 (Wild Life stability 99%), which corresponds to roughly 2 FPS in the graphics test — enough for smooth UI navigation and casual games, but not for sustained high-frame-rate gaming.
Real-world editorial coverage describes the 5.4 as a capable mid-range performer for typical tasks (web, messaging, media) but not competitive with newer 5G-capable or higher-performance budget phones. If you routinely run heavy GPU workloads or want long-term performance headroom, the Snapdragon 662 will be a limiting factor.
Is the 6.39-inch screen good enough?
The 5.4 uses a 6.39-inch LCD at 1560×720 pixels. That HD resolution is explicit in publisher testing and is a downgrade in pixel density compared with many rivals; TechAdvisor and PCMag note the resolution as a clear trade-off. The panel is described as bright in PCMag’s notes but its 720p pixel count reduces sharpness for text and high-detail content versus FHD panels.
Design cues differ between publications — PCMag describes a teardrop notch while Nokiapoweruser and others reference a punch-hole — but all agree the front is dominated by the 6.39-inch LCD and that the glass over the display is strengthened. If display sharpness and high pixel density are priorities, this is a weak point.
Does the 48MP main camera perform well?
The Nokia 5.4 includes a 48 MP main sensor as the headline camera spec. TechAdvisor explicitly praises the main camera performance and Nokiapoweruser describes a markedly improved quad-camera module versus the Nokia 5.3, indicating solid stills from the primary lens in typical daylight conditions.
However, PCMag characterizes the phone’s cameras overall as “ho-hum,” which highlights inconsistent impressions across reviewers. In short: the 48 MP main camera can produce good shots in many conditions, but multisource testing suggests camera consistency and overall imaging package (processing, low-light performance, auxiliary lenses) are not class-leading.
How long does the battery actually last?
Published commentary on battery life is mixed: TechAdvisor lists long battery life among its pros, while PCMag calls battery life middling. UL Benchmarks’ methodology notes battery-life medians vary widely based on user-submitted tests and screen brightness differences, and the site cautions readings should be interpreted as real-world medians rather than lab-controlled numbers.
There is no single, authoritative median hour value available in the sources provided, so the honest takeaway is variability: some reviewers found the 5.4 easily lasts through a day of mixed use, others felt it underwhelmed compared with the competition. If battery longevity under heavy workloads is critical, look for more consistent lab-tested alternatives.
Is the build quality and software experience a strong suit?
Physically, PCMag reports a 6.3 × 3.0 × 0.3 inch footprint and a weight of 6.4 ounces, with a thick polycarbonate rear and chassis that showed no frame flex in their handling. Nokiapoweruser highlights a nano-textured curved back that improves grip. HMD claims the phone is water-resistant but not fully waterproof.
On software, the 5.4 ships with stock Android 10. TechAdvisor points out the advantage of stock Android and the expectation of OS upgrade(s). For buyers who want a clean Android interface and vendor-supplied updates rather than heavy OEM skins, the 5.4 is an appealing choice.
Pros & Cons
- ✅ 6.39-inch display with a bright 1560×720 LCD — large, readable screen for media
- ✅ Snapdragon 662 chipset with 4 GB or 6 GB RAM options for dependable everyday performance
- ✅ 48 MP main camera provides strong daytime shots according to some reviewers
- ✅ Solid build: polycarbonate chassis, no reported frame flex, weight 6.4 ounces and nano-textured curved back
- ✅ Stock Android 10 with expectation of OS upgrades (clean software experience)
- ❌ Display limited to 1560×720 (HD) resolution — less sharp than FHD competitors
- ❌ No 5G modem — lacks next-gen cellular connectivity
- ❌ Published battery-life assessments are mixed (PCMag calls it middling; TechAdvisor calls it long)
- ❌ Camera package receives inconsistent reviews — PCMag reports ‘ho-hum’ cameras despite a 48 MP main sensor
- ❌ Positioning criticized as higher than expected versus better-specced rivals (PCMag notes it feels overpriced)
How It Compares to the Competition
- Samsung Galaxy A32 5G — Offers 5G connectivity and a stronger value proposition in sub‑$300 comparisons according to PCMag; better long-term connectivity for buyers who need 5G.
- Realme 7 — Higher-performance alternative cited by TechAdvisor — stronger on raw specs and gaming than the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia 5.4.
- Nokia 5.3 — The immediate predecessor with a comparable design; 5.4 makes camera and cosmetic changes but reviewers note some downgrades vs the 5.3 in certain areas.
Who Should Buy This & Who Should Skip It
Buy it if: Buy the Nokia 5.4 if you want a clean Android 10 experience with likely OS upgrades, a solidly built handset (polycarbonate chassis, nano-textured back) and a large 6.39-inch display, and you’re satisfied with mid-range Snapdragon 662 performance and no 5G.
Skip it if: Skip the Nokia 5.4 if you need 5G, a higher-resolution display, consistently long battery life under heavy use, or class-leading cameras — in those cases the Galaxy A32 5G, Realme 7 or other FHD/5G alternatives are better fits.
Search Purchase Options
Use these links to search for Nokia 5.4 on trusted marketplaces. The links open in new tabs; if you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
* Affiliate links: you pay the same price either way.