Trader Joe's Fig Bites (also sold as Fig Cookies) are the chain’s fig-bar-style cookie: a baked outer cookie filled with a fig paste. The product has been repackaged and renamed in recent years and — according to multiple consumer reports — the current Fig Cookies are a different size/format than earlier Fig Bites. They aim at shoppers who want a familiar fig-newton-like snack without some of the additives many associate with national-brand options.
This review compiles public product information and community reaction from Trader Joe’s product pages and independent reporting, plus nutrition-data aggregators and user discussions. Primary sources include the Trader Joe’s product listing, the What’s Good at Trader Joe’s blog post and reader comments, EatThisMuch and Nutribit nutrition summaries, and multiple user reports on Reddit and Fooducate referenced in the research brief.
High-level verdict: nutritionally these are predictable—150 calories per two cookies (about 375 kcal/100 g), heavy on carbs and modest in fat—while the ingredient list is straightforward (unbleached enriched flour, cane sugar, figs, tapioca syrup, palm oil, agave syrup). The selling points are a familiar fig-newton taste and simpler ingredients than some national brands, but consistent consumer complaints about changed formulation, fewer/wider cookies per pack, and sticky cookies that cling together hurt the experience.
What the label actually says
Two cookies contain 150 calories; macronutrient breakdown reported by EatThisMuch and Nutribit shows roughly 76% carbohydrates, 21% fat and 3% protein by calorie share. The product's calorie density is reported at about 375 Calories per 100 grams. Per-serving fat is listed as 3.5 grams with 1.5 grams saturated fat.
For buyers tracking macros or calorie density: these are carb-forward cookies with modest fat and very low protein per serving, so they behave like a sweet cookie/snack rather than a balanced mini-meal.
Simple ingredient list with a few items to note
Top ingredients cited by a product write-up include unbleached enriched flour, cane sugar, figs, tapioca syrup, palm oil, and agave syrup. The blog covering the product also notes the figs used in earlier Fig Bites were described as imported from Turkey.
That ingredient set explains the product’s soft, slightly sticky texture (syrups + fruit paste) and why some shoppers prefer it to cookies containing hydrogenated oils or high-fructose corn syrup; the blog explicitly contrasts Trader Joe’s formulation with Nabisco Fig Newtons on that point.
Familiar fig-newton flavor, but texture complaints are widespread
Multiple consumer accounts describe the cookies as tasting “vaguely fig-newton-esque”: soft, crumbly and sweet fig paste inside a baked exterior. The core flavor profile aligns with expectations for a fig bar.
However, several sources — a dedicated blog and Reddit threads — report that the current Fig Cookies stick together in the package (described as glued by sticky fig juice), are crumbly, and have changed from prior versions. Readers say the cookies are wider but fewer per pack compared to the predecessor Fig Bites.
Repackaging and portion changes matter to shoppers
A blog covering the product states the current Fig Cookies were repackaged and renamed and suggests there are fewer cookies per pack than before, estimating 'about a dozen' in the referenced package. Other commenters noted that cookies are wider, which supports the observation of fewer pieces per package.
Practical impact: shoppers expecting the predecessor's count and texture may be disappointed; the sticking issue also affects openness and handling, since cookies can clump together and break when separated.
How these compare to alternatives and where they fit
Compared with national fig-bar options referenced in the brief, the product is pitched as having simpler ingredients and avoiding hydrogenated oils or HFCS — a point highlighted by the blog that contrasts Trader Joe’s cookies with Nabisco Fig Newtons.
Use-wise, these work as a grab-and-go sweet snack for people who want a familiar fig cookie and who prioritize simpler ingredient lists. They are less well suited for buyers sensitive to sticky, clumped packaging or those seeking the exact taste/format of the earlier Trader Joe’s Fig Bites.
Pros & Cons
- ✅ 150 calories per serving (two cookies) — clear, predictable snack portion
- ✅ Ingredient list centers on recognizable items (flour, cane sugar, figs, tapioca syrup, agave syrup) rather than hydrogenated oils or HFCS as noted in blog coverage
- ✅ Familiar fig-newton-style flavor that many shoppers find comparable to classic fig bars
- ✅ Reported calorie density about 375 kcal per 100 g — useful for tracking portion energy
- ❌ Multiple user reports that cookies stick together in the package (described as 'glued' by sticky fig paste)
- ❌ Product was repackaged/renamed and many shoppers report fewer, wider cookies per pack compared with the predecessor Fig Bites
- ❌ Texture complaints: crumbly and soft in a way some users find inferior to the previous formulation
- ❌ Contains palm oil (listed among top ingredients) and 1.5 g saturated fat per two-cookie serving
How It Compares to the Competition
- Nabisco Fig Newtons — Classic fig-bar benchmark; Trader Joe’s is presented as a simpler-ingredient alternative but is often compared unfavorably on texture by users.
- Trader Joe's previous Fig Bites (prior packaging) — The immediate predecessor in Trader Joe’s lineup — many shoppers say the current Fig Cookies are larger but fewer and taste/texture-changed from the earlier Fig Bites.
- Store-brand fig bars (other grocery brands) — Other store-brand fig bars offer similar fig-newton flavor profiles; differences among brands center on texture, ingredient lists and packaging rather than radically different flavors.
Who Should Buy This & Who Should Skip It
Buy it if: Buy if you want a classic fig-newton-style snack with a straightforward ingredients list (unbleached flour, cane sugar, figs, tapioca syrup) and you value avoiding hydrogenated oils or HFCS as discussed in community write-ups. The product suits shoppers who prioritize familiar sweet fig flavor and predictable per-serving calories (150 kcal per two cookies).
Skip it if: Skip if you’re sensitive to sticky packaging or need consistent portion counts — multiple shoppers report cookies clumping together and fewer/wider cookies per pack versus older versions. Also skip if you prefer firmer texture or higher-protein snacks, since these are carb-forward with low protein.
Search Purchase Options
Use these links to search for Trader Joe's Fig Bites / Fig Cookies on trusted marketplaces. The links open in new tabs; if you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
* Affiliate links: you pay the same price either way.